TopStep vs FundedNext Futures: prop firm rules compared

At the $50,000 account size, TopStep's evaluation allows a $2,000 max drawdown (end-of-day trailing, locks at breakeven) against FundedNext Futures' $2,000 (end-of-day trailing, locks at breakeven), with profit targets of $3,000 and $3,000 respectively. Both allow the same dollar drawdown at that size. TopStep applies a consistency rule (max 50% of total profit from one day); FundedNext Futures does not. Both pay out on demand.

Rule (evaluation phase)
FNFundedNext FuturesRapid model
$50,000 account
Profit target$3,000$3,000
Daily loss limitNoneNone
Max drawdown$2,000$2,000
$100,000 account
Profit target$6,000$5,000
Daily loss limitNoneNone
Max drawdown$3,000$2,500
Firm-wide
Drawdown modelEnd-of-day trailing, locks at breakevenEnd-of-day trailing, locks at breakeven
Consistency ruleMax 50% of total profit from one dayNone
Minimum trading daysNoneNone
Profit split90/1080/20
Payout frequencyOn demandOn demand
Account sizes offered$50,000 · $100,000 · $150,000$25,000 · $50,000 · $100,000
Rules confidenceRules verifiedRules verified

FundedNext Futures figures are for the Rapid model; it also sells: Legacy, Bolt.

Which one should you pick?

It depends on how you trade. A trader who takes a few larger positions is exposed to a consistency rule and an intraday-trailing drawdown very differently from one who scalps small size all session; payout cadence and profit split matter more once you are funded than during the evaluation. Read both rule sets in the table above against your own average day, then confirm the current terms on TopStep's site and FundedNext Futures's site. PassTraq tracks challenges at both firms using the same rule presets shown here.

More comparisons

Rules are sourced from each firm's official help centre and can change without notice — always confirm on the firm's site before buying an evaluation. Where a link is a partner link, it is marked as such.