Bulenox vs Phidias: prop firm rules compared

At the $50,000 account size, Bulenox's evaluation allows a $2,500 max drawdown (intraday trailing, locks at breakeven) against Phidias' $2,500 (end-of-day trailing), with profit targets of $3,000 and $4,000 respectively. Both allow the same dollar drawdown at that size. Neither firm applies a consistency rule. Both pay out on demand.

Rule (evaluation phase)
BXBulenoxOption 1 (Intraday) model
PHPhidiasFundamental model
$50,000 account
Profit target$3,000$4,000
Daily loss limitNoneNone
Max drawdown$2,500$2,500
$100,000 account
Profit target$6,000$6,000
Daily loss limitNoneNone
Max drawdown$3,000$3,000
$150,000 account
Profit target$9,000$9,000
Daily loss limitNoneNone
Max drawdown$4,500$4,500
Firm-wide
Drawdown modelIntraday trailing, locks at breakevenEnd-of-day trailing
Consistency ruleNoneNone
Minimum trading daysNoneNone
Profit split90/1080/20
Payout frequencyOn demandOn demand
Account sizes offered$25,000 · $50,000 · $100,000 · $150,000 · $250,000$50,000 · $100,000 · $150,000
Rules confidenceRules verifiedRules verified

Bulenox figures are for the Option 1 (Intraday) model; it also sells: Option 2 (EOD + daily-loss).

Phidias figures are for the Fundamental model; it also sells: Premium (Swing), 25K Static.

Which one should you pick?

It depends on how you trade. A trader who takes a few larger positions is exposed to a consistency rule and an intraday-trailing drawdown very differently from one who scalps small size all session; payout cadence and profit split matter more once you are funded than during the evaluation. Read both rule sets in the table above against your own average day, then confirm the current terms on Bulenox's site and Phidias's site. PassTraq tracks challenges at both firms using the same rule presets shown here.

More comparisons

Rules are sourced from each firm's official help centre and can change without notice — always confirm on the firm's site before buying an evaluation. Where a link is a partner link, it is marked as such.